U.S., Europe or China: Who is the global climate’s superhero?
How do the three countries compare in climate policies? China is already leading the pack in renewable energy and electric vehicles, but is lacking in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology and subsidies for fossil fuels. China’s rise in renewable energy is breath-taking: it has recorded an over 800% increase in installed capacity for renewable energy since 2000, while the EU and the U.S. saw “only” 230% and 160%, respectively. As a result, installed capacity in the U.S. is now around one third of that in China, and the EU stands at two thirds. Back in 2000, all three economies were more or less on the same level. In addition, China’s Electric Vehicles stock is higher than that of the U.S. and the EU combined. The U.S., however, is still leading CCS technologies and has the lowest subsidies for fossil fuel among the three economies.
The race for being a climate superpower is open – but it is too early to choose a winner. Our comparative analysis makes it clear that all three economies have to accelerate their climate efforts, materially and quickly. But all face different hurdles. China’s commitment towards climate neutrality lacks visibility. The EU’s Recovery Fund might be stuck or watered down in its Kafkaesque bureaucracy. And the U.S. has to overcome its highly divisive elections. Even after Covid-19, climate policy remains a race full of hurdles. But unlike the wrangle for technological and geopolitical hegemony, this might produce the right winner: the global climate.