Allianz Group Communications
Receive the latest Allianz news.
The United States represents the largest final consumer market with nearly 30 percent of global household consumption. As it contemplates more protectionist policies, the world may have to find itself a substitute. China is a strong candidate thanks to its economic size and growth track record.Allianz SE
The global economy did start the year on a strong note as global trade accelerated, driven by strong import growth from China and the U.S. Yet, more protectionist measures from the U.S. could harm this outlook. Imports from the U.S. account for 13.5 percent of global imports of goods and services. More importantly, the U.S. is the largest final consumer market with nearly 30 percent of global household’s consumption.
As China accelerated its internationalization (2010-2015), its economic size ($11 trillion plus), recent growth trajectory (6 percent plus per annum in real terms over 2017-18), and ambition to uphold free trade, make it a strong candidate to offset a potential retreat from the U.S. as the number 1 consumer market.
Strong consumption growth and greater openness could push China to become the single largest consumer market – one day. In 2016, China’s consumer market accounted for 10 percent of the total aggregate household consumption and the U.S. consumer market still is 2.9 times larger than China’s. However, China now represents 1/3 of the U.S. consumer market (a rise from being 1/10 in 2005) and now accounts for 25 percent of the total consumption growth, when it was only 9 percent in 2005. In the meantime, the U.S. went from accounting for 30 percent in 2005 to 25 percent in 2016.
Our central scenario for China is that growth will rise by +6.7 percent in 2017 to slow gradually to +6.0 percent by 2020 reflecting a progressive tightening of monetary policy and continued cutting of overcapacity. Proactive fiscal policies with public deficit above 3 percent GDP will support domestic demand. Post 2020, economic growth is set to stabilize around a slower but healthier pace of +5.5 percent underpinned by solid growth in domestic private demand. Less leverage and less overcapacity would allow a positive and sustainable rise in investment which may create a positive feedback loop, fostering wages and employment and thus consumption. Net trade performance would decrease gradually reflecting stronger growth in imports.
Assuming a gradual opening from the Mainland to foreign goods1, a broadly stable trade compact with the U.S.2, and that the Chinese private consumption in U.S. dollar terms grows at a pace of +8 percent per annum in the longer term (compared to a pace of +16.5 percent per annum in 2005-15) and that the U.S. one reties with long-term trend (+4.0 percent per annum), China aggregate household consumption could match the U.S. in 2040.
1 President Xi’s recent political call for a more open economy echoes a gradual opening of the Chinese market for investors and exporters alike, which is confirmed by the reduction by a third year-to-date of the number of protectionist measures. Note that consumer goods are often spared while harmful trade restrictions often focus on industrial goods (chemicals, metals), according to Global Trade Alert.
2 The last 10-point bilateral trade agreement points to that direction: China agreed to open its market for specific US corporates (beef and LNG exporters, credit card providers and rating agencies); and the U.S. made concessions on poultry imports from China, and promised fair treatment of Chinese banks in the U.S. While this secondary (the bulk of China-U.S. trade is concentrated in Electronic and Electrical), it sends positive signals to investors and corporates worried by a trade war between the two nations.
There are three driving forces behind the rise of the Chinese consumer.
In the short term, there is room for firm growth in private consumption: +7.1 percent in real terms in 2017. Households’ balance sheets are robust as household’s debt is relatively low at about 45 percent GDP and household’s savings accounts for 36 percent of their disposable income. In the wake of the 13mn additional urban jobs created in 2016, we expect an increase of +12 million in 2017. Last, wages are set to increase as: corporates profits are improving (industrial profit up +22.7 YTD y/y in Jan-May; +8.5 percent in 2016 after -2.3 percent in 2015); there is a continued rise in minimum wages (albeit at a slower pace); and population is aging and the supply of high skilled workers is tight.
In the longer term, Manufacturing 2025 will be pivotal to ensure sustainable growth of private consumption. It consists of a comprehensive upgrade of China’s manufacturing sector to higher tech and higher value added activities. Key measures include: (i) supportive policies (fiscal incentives, public investment, e.g.) for the development of 10 key sectors (see Figure 4); and (ii) major changes in the business environment to promote innovation (with strengthened Intellectual Property Rights protection, e.g.). Going forward, the change in the Chinese growth model should be reflected in employment and wages structure: white collars, high-skilled, and jobs with higher pays should increase. This will in turn increase the overall purchasing power of the Chinese consumer for foreign goods and services.
On top of higher revenues, the Chinese consumer will need to have a fully convertible and strong currency, buy and borrow from abroad with reduced risk of transaction. In 2016, renminbi weaknesses mechanically translated into subdued wealth effect in U.S. dollar terms: China’s U.S. dollar-denominated GDP growth slowed to +1.3 percent in 2017 (from +5.5 percent in 2015), slower than US nominal economic growth (+3 percent in 2016). Total capital outflows were substantial at $640 billion in 2016 ($647 billion in 2015). Figure 5 shows that higher policy uncertainty explains most currency movements.
Going forward, capital account liberalization and a successful internationalization of the renminbi are sine qua none conditions for the Chinese consumer to matter. A stronger renminbi would improve China’s purchasing power, decrease imports costs and support a rise in domestic consumption; the Chinese private sector could rely more on external financing and stimulate the economy further. Further financial openness, sound policies to lure investors (reduce overcapacity and debt concerns), and enhanced currency management are needed. There are all on the to-do list.
China’s decisive move to speed up its influence agenda will help put the Chinese consumer at the center stage. A couple of examples of the Chinese block approach: First, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership could be a game changer. The group, which involves China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand and ASEAN members represents 25 percent of global households’ consumption, 27 percent of global imports of goods and services, and 45 percent of global savings – an impressive amount to finance home-grown investments. Secondly, One Belt One Road (OBOR), which could also initiate a positive feedback loop from investment and trade to consumption. The strategy aims at boost connectivity and cooperation across countries in Asia, Europe, Middle East and Africa through infrastructure investment.
These two initiatives come on top of a myriad of bilateral agreements that China has been sealing with countries from Iran to the U.S. to Panama and Angola, across sectors. As a result, the Chinese consumer’s tastes have changed, in sync with China’s selective opening to the rest of the world. Going forward, we believe that economic diplomacy will continue to boost the share of global consumption coming from China.
If China were to become the largest final consumer, the winners will be threefold.
First, high-quality goods producers. China’s demand for consumer goods has increased rapidly between 2005 and 2015, at an average growth rate of +14 percent per annum led by a rise in demand for cars, pharmaceuticals and food products, in line with the rise of the middle class. Countries that are investing heavily in innovation and that are well positioned in selling consumer goods to China have better chance to catch the eye of the Chinese consumer: Western European countries such as Germany, Switzerland and France, and Asian markets like Japan and Singapore. South Korea, Taiwan, and the U.S. are also very competitive but politics could cloud the outlook.
Second, cheap and nearby commodity producers. Industrial needs for commodities may be less important as the country moves to a more service-based and quality-driven economy. So the winners will be on the most cost-competitive suppliers. Large regional producers such as Indonesia-Malaysia (Mining, Energy), Russia (Energy) and Australia (Mining) will remain close partners due to strong economies of scale and strong positioning. However, we expect newcomers like Mongolia, Myanmar, and Turkmenistan to grab market share gradually as improved infrastructure eases transaction costs. Robust opportunities in agriculture will continue to rely on ASEAN and Australia-New Zealand production.
Third, strategic and cheap manufacturing suppliers. With rising labor costs in the Mainland, China’s companies are set to outsource part of their manufacturing production (low tech, labor intensive) to lower-cost countries. South Asian markets (Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka) and ASEAN CMLV (Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam) would be the main winners. Figure 8 provides evidence of growing integration between China and the CMLV with rising investment from China to these markets and imports from these markets to China. Competitive labor costs, large and young workforce, geographical proximity to China and goof connectivity improvement determine the main winners.
Going forward, we see three risks that could hinder this projection. They are at a low likelihood for now but will require close monitoring.
First, a disorderly adjustment in China. Credit risk is elevated with corporate debt at 166 percent of GDP, and the return of shadow banking activities (27 percent of aggregate credit lending flows in Jan-April 2017) fuel persisting overcapacity (in basic material, e.g.). China has started to adopt targeted macro-prudential rules to address such risk but should China undergo a credit crisis, the consumer will have to tighten its belt and therefore contribute less to global consumption growth.
Secondly, a negative demand shock from the U.S. The U.S. account for 18 percent of China’s merchandise exports that is to say 3.4 percent of GDP. As such, a sharp decrease in demand from the U.S. could have a significant impact on export revenues, industrial production, and thus job creation and consumption growth. Disappointing policies and clear signaling of protectionism – China represented 44 percent of the U.S. trade balance deficit for goods in Q1 2017 – could jeopardize consumer awakening.
Last, geopolitical tensions in Asia. Renewed risk of war in the Korean peninsula is the most immediate concern. Regional tensions have escalated recently with North Korea stepping up its military efforts. In the long run, China will also have to face rising discontent from legacy frenemies nations such as India as OBOR includes a China-Pakistan Economic Corridor on disputed territory.
The Allianz Group is one of the world's leading insurers and asset managers with more than 86 million retail and corporate customers. Allianz customers benefit from a broad range of personal and corporate insurance services, ranging from property, life and health insurance to assistance services to credit insurance and global business insurance. Allianz is one of the world’s largest investors, managing over 650 billion euros on behalf of its insurance customers while our asset managers Allianz Global Investors and PIMCO manage an additional 1.3 trillion euros of third-party assets. Thanks to our systematic integration of ecological and social criteria in our business processes and investment decisions, we hold a leading position in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. In 2016, over 140,000 employees in more than 70 countries achieved total revenue of 122 billion euros and an operating profit of 11 billion euros for the group.
Euler Hermes is the global leader in trade credit insurance and a recognized specialist in the areas of bonding, guarantees and collections. With more than 100 years of experience, the company offers business-to-business (B2B) clients financial services to support cash and trade receivables management. Its proprietary intelligence network tracks and analyzes daily changes in corporate solvency among small, medium and multinational companies active in markets representing 92 percent of global GDP. Headquartered in Paris, the company is present in over 50 countries with 5,800+ employees. Euler Hermes is a subsidiary of Allianz, listed on Euronext Paris (ELE.PA) and rated AA- by Standard & Poor’s and Dagong Europe. The company posted a consolidated turnover of 2.6 billion euros in 2016 and insured global business transactions for 883 billion euros in exposure at the end of 2016.
As with all content published on this site, these statements are subject to our Forward Looking Statement disclaimer:
Phone: +49 89 3800 16891