Bubbles in all asset classes

Jay Ralph, Head of Allianz Asset Management, recommends shares in his interview with "Finanz und Wirtschaft" magazine, but expresses concerns over possible money supply inflation.

Mr. Ralph, Allianz's asset management can look back on a strong year. What do you think lies ahead for the next five years?

 

Jay Ralph: It was, in fact, a record year with an operating profit just shy of €3 bn. We aim to achieve net inflows of new funds averaging 5% to 10% of the assets under management p.a. over the market cycle as a whole. In five years' time, our division could have boosted its contribution to the consolidated result from 28% to around one third.

 

And you'll be sticking with the two-pillar structure - Pimco und Allianz Global Investors (AGI)?

 

Yes, we have not lost one single client due to the new structure and customers can make a choice.

 

Do you plan to make any acquisitions?

 

Our focus in the asset management business is on organic growth. I don't see any need at all to make acquisitions either at Pimco or at AGI. On the other hand, we cannot rule out a scenario in which we will look for outstanding talents for areas like emerging markets or alternative investments, for example.

 

What is currently the biggest challenge facing asset managers?

 

The financial repression and the unsolved question as to what will happen when the central banks stop buying bonds and other securities. This could be a sort of "cold turkey" situation. We simply do not yet know what it will really mean for the markets. The risk gets bigger with every additional year in which the central banks intervene.

 

What sort of things are you worried about?

 

Asset bubbles. The problem is likely to be less one of inflation in the real economy and more one of money supply inflation. What will happen to the price of the securities that the central banks have been buying to date? There is no doubt that the interest rates will rise if there are fewer buyers. But I don't think we can expect the central banks to withdraw completely over the next few years. The growth prospects are simply to poor to allow this.

 

Where do you believe that valuation bubbles are lurking?

 

The high liquidity means that there are probably bubbles in quite a few asset classes, probably across the board. The difficulty lies in finding the highest relative value. Assuming that all other things remain equal, the change in the value of real assets is more pronounced. Be it real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, metals or other commodities. High-quality shares are another very attractive segment.

 

The Italian elections have triggered another wave of anxiety, do you think this is justified?

 

Without closer fiscal and economic union, European Monetary Union is unlikely to become strong. The central bank has merely bought time. So far, mere announcements have been enough. It will take a decade to implement reforms, and this creates problems. And it is important not to slash the debt ratios too quickly, because growth would then suffer as a result. On the other hand, some countries need to get their debt back to a manageable level.

 

What risks do you think arise as a result of the revolts in the Middle East and North Africa?

 

Allianz does not have much money invested in this region ( ALV111,251, 0.36%). Investments in the region are also low in terms of global capital. But the potential for turbulence is significant. An escalating political or military conflict in this region, which is crucial for energy supplies, would be a major shock for the markets. The European and US economies are just getting back on their feet after a period of low growth rates – the recovery is a fragile one.

 

What does this mean for investment strategy?

 

The difficulty lies in achieving a satisfactory return. The solvency regulations mean that there is an ever-growing trend towards long-term fixed income investments. The situation is compounded by demographic change. If more people start reaching retirement age, assets will tend to be shifted from equities to bonds. We are witnessing an ongoing trend: the transfer of our customers' funds to more complex investments, mainly towards multi-asset strategies.

 

Do you share the view that we are seeing a prolonged shift from bonds to equities due to the looming risk of inflation?

 

In view of the zero interest rate policy, the dividend yields for high-quality shares exceed the bond yields. This means that equities are looking more attractive than bonds. We are witnessing more of a focus on equities at Pimco and AGI at the moment. In terms of the portfolio as a whole, the equity position managed directly by Pimco is still relatively low, but there are a large number of strategies that combine bond and equity strategies. This part of the business is growing fast.

 

So does the environment actually allow for an increase in the valuation multiples for equities?

 

In a stable recovery scenario, it certainly would, this would be what we would expect. But we must not forget the interest rate development.

Jay Ralph, member of the Board of Management at Allianz SE: "It was, in fact, a record year with an operating profit just shy of three billion euros."
Jay Ralph, member of the Board of Management at Allianz SE: "It was, in fact, a record year with an operating profit just shy of three billion euros."
The euro crisis is a major event. It has clearly shown us that there is no such thing as a risk-free asset class and has resulted in a significant deterioration in the credit quality of some countries.

"The euro crisis is a major event. It has clearly shown us that there is no such thing as a risk-free asset class and has resulted in a significant deterioration in the credit quality of some countries."

You once said that there is no such thing as a risk-free asset class anymore. Does that still hold true?

That's right. The euro crisis is a major event. It has clearly shown us that there is no such thing as a risk-free asset class. In the past, some countries became insolvent. But the widening of the interest rate differential in Europe is a particularly serious matter. Investors have to do their homework and cannot afford to just buy blindly.

But isn't the regulatory framework, which is, in fact, consistent with the political will, reinforcing the status of government bonds as a risk-free investment?

Yes, nowadays, insurers have to set a great deal of capital aside for equities, for example. So do the valid regulations make sense from a theoretical or economic point of view? That is the question. In the G-20 states, there is intense debate as to how to return to growth and get the unemployment rate down. Buying government bonds is not the way to achieve this. It would be better to invest in companies that are creating jobs and offering products that appeal to consumers.

Could this prompt the rotation from bonds to equities mentioned earlier?

Compared with bond yields, equity returns are more attractive at the moment. But the fact that one asset class becomes less attractive does not mean that it will disappear completely. There will still be a large number of bonds when the "morning after" dawns.

Can Allianz achieve the desired and necessary degree of risk diversification?

Yes, and that's what our job is all about.  There is no doubt that it is attractive to have a diverse range of assets. We are active managers on both the equity and the fixed-income side. I think this is exactly what is needed in times of upheaval.

Is the heyday of exchange-traded funds a thing of the past?

An ETF has the same legal form as an investment fund. There are passive and active ETFs. There is no doubt that passive ETFs benefit investors who concentrate on market beta. This explains why they are just as important a portfolio component as actively managed funds are.

What do you think about the high-yield market?

High-yield investments have shown very positive development to date, but this is unlikely to continue to the same extent. Nevertheless, high-yield investments - assigned a low weighting - will remain part of portfolio allocation.

What about duration management?

This is a very investor-specific matter. For Allianz – our biggest customer - we are trying, in the life insurance business, to keep the duration of assets and liabilities as similar as possible. Our room for maneuver is limited in this respect. We can reallocate some funds to infrastructure investments, but this is obviously also a question of flexibility.

Do the requirements imposed by rating agencies and regulators in the infrastructure business allow the right sort of scope?

Investments in real assets come hand-in-hand with considerable capital adequacy requirements, be it for real estate, equities or infrastructure projects. In the current low interest rate environment, in which institutional investors are forced to up their share of alternative investments, the high capital requirements are having a negative impact. Investors are not doing what makes economic sense, but rather what ties up less capital based on the solvency regulations. The alternative is to set more risk capital aside and to invest in areas that really make economic sense. This is why Allianz is holding on to its substantial capital buffer, in order to be more flexible and yet still keep a conservative rating. It is impossible to have it all. Anyone wanting to invest in real assets has to back them up with more capital, which translates into a lower return on equity in the short term.

What strategy are you pursuing in the infrastructure and renewables segment?

We have set up an infrastructure debt and equity team. These investments offer high and relatively stable cash flows and attractive risk premiums. The trade-off is the lower liquidity. What is more, it takes months to identify high-quality opportunities. We have established a renewables portfolio of around €1.3 bn. The pace at which the portfolio continues to grow will depend on whether or not we identify attractive investments. In terms of volume, there are no limits for Allianz.

Renewables could come under pressure if subsidies are scrapped.

Yes, this will change the cost-effectiveness, but the impact varies considerably from project to project. The prices of fossil fuels also play a role here. We have noticed that policymakers are taking a different stance, which is changing the attractiveness of this segment. But for us, as an investor, the fundamental question is not so much whether certain subsidies are received, but rather more a question of whether the conditions remain stable throughout the entire investment horizon.

As with all content published on this site, these statements are subject to our Forward Looking Statement disclaimer:

Claudia Mohr-Calliet
Allianz SE
Phone +49.89.3800-18797
Send email